|
CATEGORY
|
BEGINNING |
DEVELOPING
|
ACCOMPLISHED
|
SCORE |
|
Overall (This
refers to the WebQuest page itself |
|

Overall
Visual Appeal |
0 POINTS
There are few or no graphic
elements. Color is garish. Background interferes with the
readability. |
2 POINTS
Graphics elements sometimes, but
not always, contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas and
relationships. There is some variation in type size, color and layout. |
4 POINTS
Appropriate graphic elements are
used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of
concepts, ideas and relationships. Difference in type size and color. |
|
|

Navigation & Flow |
0 POINTS
Getting through the lesson
is confusing. Pages can't be found easily and the way back isn't
clear. |
2 POINTS
There are a few places where
the learner can get lost and know where to go next. |
4 POINTS
It is always clear to the
learner what are the pieces are and how to get to them. |
|
|

Mechanical Aspects |
0 POINTS
There are more than 5 broken
links, missing images, misspelling and/or grammatical errors. |
1 POINTS
There are some broken links,
missing images, misspelling and/or grammatical errors.
|
2 POINTS
No mechanical problems noted. |
|
|
Introduction |
|

Cognitive
Effectiveness of the Introduction |
0 POINTS
The introduction doesn't
prepare the reader for what is to come, or build on what the learner already
knows. |
1 POINTS
The introduction makes some
reference to learner's prior knowledge and previews to some extent what the
lesson is about. |
2 POINTS
The introduction builds on
learner's prior knowledge and effectively prepares the learner by
foreshadowing what the lesson is about. |
|
|
Task (The task
is the result of student efforts. Not the steps involved in getting
there) |
|

Cognitive
level of the task |
0 POINTS
Task requires simple
comprehending or retelling of information found on web pages and answering
factual questions.. |
3 POINTS
Task is doable but is
limited in its significance to students' lives. The task requires
analysis of information and/or putting together information from several
sources. |
6 POINTS
The task is doable and engaging. The task requires
synthesis of multiples sources of information. |
|
|
Process (The process is the step by
step description of how students will accomplish the task) |
|

Clarity of Process |
0 POINTS
Process is not clearly
stated. Students will not know exactly what they were supposed to do
just from reading this. |
2 POINTS
Some directions are given,
but there is missing information. Students might be confused.. |
4 POINTS
Every step is clearly
stated. Most students would know exactly where they are at each step.. |
|
|
Resources |
|
Quality of Resources |
0 POINTS
Links are mundane. They
lead to information that could be found in a classroom encyclopedia. |
2 POINTS
Some links carry
information not ordinarily found in a classroom. |
4 POINTS
Varied resources provide
enough meaningful information for students to think deeply. |
|
|
Evaluation |
|
Clarity of Evaluation
Criteria |
0 POINTS
Criteria for success are
not described. |
3 POINTS
Criteria for success are at
least partially described |
6 POINTS
Criteria for success are
clearly stated in the form of a rubric. The evaluation instrument
clearly measures what students must know and be able to accomplish the task. |
|
|
SCORE |
|
|
|
/32 |